Voting for ANYONE but Boris...

I am now able to vote on 1st May, so I am going to set out my stall now, in the hope that someone, anyone, will listen...

PLEASE DON'T VOTE FOR BORIS JOHNSON!

He is only popular because of novelty value, and is simply "doing a Cameron" and announcing populist ideas that either wouldn't work or would make things worse in London. As well as opposing environment-improving measures already in place and sharing George W. Bush's view on the Kyoto Protocol (which is selfish, ignorant and criminal, in my opinion - that's Boris, not the Kyoto Protocol...).

Just please, listen to reason. As whimsical and comic on Have I Got News For You as he may have been... and despite of as good an impression of a scarecrow as I've ever seen... Is he really the kind of person you want in charge? Even if you don't want Ken again, Boris is NOT the only alternative!

I would normally look to vote for the Lib Dems, if I'm honest. But this time, their candidate is awful. Essentially, they're fielding a single-issue candidate in Brian Paddick. All he knows is crime, being an ex-Met Police Commissioner. All I've heard him talk about is crime. Y-A-W-N.
But I'd rather he got in than Boris Johnson without question...

For me, the choice is between the Green Party and Left List (formerly part of the Respect Coalition)... and right now, the Greens have the best manifesto of the lot. Cuts to bus and tube fares, free insulation for every home that needs it, affordable housing and a higher minimum wage in the public sector.

All that's left after that is the pointless UKIP, the unspeakable BNP, the English Democrats (who?), and the groan-causing Christian Choice party.

The most bizarre statement I've heard so far is from Richard Barnbrook, the BNP candidate. He opposes the London 2012 Olympic Games, and says he would "offer them to Athens" should he win. Well, he won't. And what's more, he clearly doesn't understand how these things all work if he thinks he'd have that choice...

But please, don't vote for Boris... you won't be able to get rid of him after half an hour...

Logo Nogo... So what?

I’m getting really sick of the ignorance and the cynicism of the people who aren’t in favour of the Olympics, and the newspapers who continually criticise some of the elements of the funding.

Particularly the people who think that we’re moving too slowly. We’re on track to be ready well in time. Athens wasn’t anywhere near this stage this far ahead, and that came off. So why on earth do they think that the UK can’t do it? We all seem to be of the opinion that Greece is a disorganised and inefficient country when it comes to major events (something seemingly borne out by the Champions League Final debacle last month), and that we’re highly capable. So what’s the issue?!

I’m particularly sick of the people who assume that things like the cost of the Olympic logo were only so high because it factors in things like corporate jollies and focus groups and that everyone in the government had a whizzo jolly time and then designed it in 10 minutes using clip art.

I don’t like the logo either, and I work for the Dept now defending it, the one responsible for the Olympic Games going ahead. And none of us had a wonderful time at anyone’s expense. In fact, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but we all have to pay tax too…

Its not the objection to the logo that I can’t stand – I totally understand that bit. It’s the assumption that every civil servant working on anything remotely linked to the games is spending the budget on fine wine and caviar and getting pissed at their desks.

Or the people who phone or write to us to complain and when they get an answer to their letter, no matter how true or complete our response, constantly accuse us of lying, or covering up, or being ignorant of what the country as a whole thinks. I forget when we selected them to talk on the country’s behalf, but there we go. We don’t express our own opinions when answering letters, just the policy. So why do they assume we are? Is everyone really as thick as that? Surely not…

We work bloody hard for very little public respect, often, and then get criticised for anything and everything – including trying to ensure our job security when thousands of civil service jobs are being cut - by newspapers who make a lot of their information up and morons who read and believe every word they say.

And as for the people who think that we shouldn’t have an Olympics because they can’t see what benefit it will have on their area, they should stop being so damn selfish. Londoners are paying more council tax to help fund the games when everyone else isn’t. The benefits will be best for Londoners, yes, but you can’t put a price on a few weeks of sport inspiring a whole new generation. Luke will be 6 when the Olympics come to town, and if he’s interested and wants to go, I’ll take him if I can. Its one of the best and high-profile events in the world, and I don’t see the point in being all po-faced about it.